Friday, 30 March 2012

Media Usage and Production Diary


The first assessment task for JOUR1111 is to log a personal media use and production diary. Over ten days I recorded all of my media usage and production and then put all the collected data into the table below with totals for each day and platform (in minutes). A lot of the time I was multitasking media usage, so some totals seem impossibly large.

Table 1

From the data I was quite shocked to find how much media I use/produce each day - especially to find that I listened to so much radio. I had never consciously noted how much I actually listened to, because I am always doing something else as well. Comparing this to the answers given in the recent survey of the cohort, we seem to be on a fairly even par.

Graph 1

By taking the averages of what each student said their daily use roughly was, and averaging out how much I used over the week, I created the above graph. The cohort (representing the average student) and I listen to about the same amount of radio each day. This is not even reaching a full hour. From this it could be deduced that today’s generation (excepting any students who are of a more mature age in the cohort) either have little time to listen to radio or we simply don’t absorb information as well by only listening to it.

This reason could explain why, on average, daily television usage was more than double the amount of radio usage.

Graph 2

In comparison to the cohort I’m on average about 5 minutes lower. However, I will watch three hours of TV and then not watch anything for the next three nights. I personally don’t watch much news (and perhaps this is a bad habit). Instead I watch game shows (e.g. Talkin’ ‘Bout Your Generation) and crime shows (e.g. The Mentalist), all of which have been pre-recorded for me. This is why I am able to a large period of shows that interest me. However, this also means that I am not exposed to recent commercials or any other programs that may be aired between the shows I enjoy watching (e.g. news).

One of the main ways I do find out about news is via the internet. The online world is an amazing source of all current news and it’s certainly part of my upbringing. Once again, I have compared the average daily usage of internet between me and the cohort.

Graph 3

I had thought I was always connected to the internet, but the collected data says otherwise. It’s true that I always have the potential to connect to the internet (due to my smartphone), however it isn’t too often that I actually do. The graph above used data from online usage and online research to create my daily usage average. Also included in my online usage was my time spent on Twitter, my blog and YouTube. I chose to keep Facebook separate because I was already aware of how much I used it prior to starting the log.
This can be seen in relation to all other platforms I used in the following graph.
Graph 4

From the graph, it is noted that Facebook is one of the higher usage items. However, mobile phone usage (sending message, calls, and applications), university readings and online use are all substantially higher. My phone usage is understandably high because it is always with me. The mobile phone has become a necessity of day-to-day life. For this reason, I have come to feel at a complete loss without my mobile phone, sending more than one text message per minute.

The only media I produced over the ten days was written media. I enjoy writing leisurely (e.g. poetry, novels, etc.). So the time spent writing includes writing study notes, progress on a novel I’m writing and poetry. It doesn’t include anything that is only brief, only items that took my at least 10 minutes of writing and can be considered as writing.

From the above data it can be seen that we all spend an astonishing amount of time using media, even if we don’t realise it. We’re entering into a new generation of media everywhere, and those who say journalism is a dying form are sorely mistaken.

Thursday, 22 March 2012

Once upon a time

Lecture four this week focused on 'factual story telling'.

A brief timeline of the history of print media:

17th century:
The first news bulletins/newspapers to start circulation. These were mostly handwritten until they began releasing printed periodicals which phased out handwritten newssheets.

1842:
The first newspaper to have illustrations was 'The Illustrated London News'. At the time of its release it was published weekly, and slowly phased out by 2003. These first ever newspaper illustrations were line drawings.

First illustrated newspapers with line drawings. 

1879:
The first photo to be published in a newspaper using halftones.

First published photo in a newspaper using halftones (rather than engraved image).  1879  "Steinway Hall" , (The Daily Graphic), NY.

1880:
The first published newsphoto in a newspaper.

First published newsphoto, 1880, "Shanty Town" by Henry J. Newton (The Daily Graphic).

1933:
Conflict between radio and newspapers breaks out. American newspapers attempt to force Associated Press to cease communication services to radio stations.

1936:
The first colour photo to be published in a newspaper.

First colour photo to be published. 1936, Scottish Daily Record & Mail. 

Also discussed was what makes a great photo?
A lot of these concepts I am already familiar with with my love all things Film and Television.

What makes a great photo?

  • Framing
  • Focus
  • Angle & Point of View (POV)
  • Exposure
  • Shutterspeed
  • Capturing 'the moment'
"A picture has no meaning at all if it can't tell a story."

The Rule of Thirds:
The theory is that if you place points of interest in the intersections or along the lines that your photo becomes more balanced and will enable a viewer of the image to interact with it more naturally. Studies have shown that when viewing images that people’s eyes usually go to one of the intersection points most naturally rather than the center of the shot – using the rule of thirds works with this natural way of viewing an image rather than working against it.

Read more: http://www.digital-photography-school.com/rule-of-thirds#ixzz1pn8niewZ
 




Two photos that I think utilise these ideas quite well are a couple of photos taken on the last day of year 12.
"Looking to the Future". Photo taken by Aliane Bylicki
This first image utilises a nice close-up frame, focusing clearly on the eye. It is the eye of a year 12 student who is nearly finished with his schooling life. The angle gives slight dominance to the subject, hinting at the power we all feel when we near our (final) completion of 12 years of schooling. If you look carefully, the reflection of school grounds is also visible.

Rule of Thirds applied
When applying the rule of thirds, it can be seen that the centre of the eye falls almost precisely on the top line. Also, the main segment of the eye is in the top third, and therefore draws a lot of attention.

"Bubbles of Fun". Photo taken by Kate Dunstan
This image is very well done for something just taken as a quick pic. The picture is quite aesthetically pleasing. This is due to the rule of thirds. It is also an excellent example of capturing 'the moment'. The pure joy on her face is very evident, and a story can quickly be deducted.


Rule of thirds applied
The main stream of bubbles in this image are along the bottom line. This acts as a vector which returns the viewer's eye to the main subject of the photo. Due to her being off-centered, she is immediately what is focused on.

And of course, if there's a photo that's ever perfectly captured the moment, it is, of course, this end of war photograph shot by Alfred Eisenstaedt.

"V-J Day in Times Square"


So from the start of print media to the end, the perfect image will always be valuable. Do you have one?

"If it makes you laugh, if it makes you cry, if it rips out your heart, that's a good picture." Eddie Adams.

Friday, 16 March 2012

Women in Comics

Haha. Aren't comics funny? Especially the old ones!

Well, recently I've been reading a few popular 'adult' graphic novels. And I've detected a common theme amongst those that I've read (Batman, Fly and X-Men): Half-dressed females! It is ridiculous the lack of fabric is alocated to these poor girls to dress themselves for crime fighting!
This is the cover of a comic called 'Fly'. I picked this up the other day, and a friend questioned my sexuality. This got me thinking, "I actually just ignore this now, because I know the story will probably be decent."
Oh dear. I have become so numb to the explicit drawings in these comics, that I just ignore them now!
We are potentially losing all of our self-dignity with images like this floating around.
Unfortunately, I think one of the worst comic book series for this sort of thing is the X-men. With so many different female characters, they seemed to run out of fabric pretty fast! Even when going to google some of the X-men characters, suggestions such as "*character* hot" or "*character* sexy" are showing up. It's so disappointing that these comics are so graphic in more ways than one; but even more so that we simply don't seem to care. 

But, the costume that leaves the least to the memory goes to.......*drumroll*

Poison Ivy! Wearing nothing but leaves, in true Adam and Eve style.


If you would like to read more, here are some good links:
The Big Sexy Problem with Superheroines and Their 'Liberated Sexuality'
Sexy Sexism in Comics

Wednesday, 14 March 2012

Texting texting? Is this thing on?

This week we focused on text and how it really is evolving and changing and everywhere in our lives
We were told that text is: fast; flexible; controlled; searchable; online. 
For these reason text has been able to evolve over so many centuries to what it is today - a very popular online media. 
Without text, we would have no Facebook (heaven forbid!), no online research, and certainly this blog wouldn't exist! And so we must be grateful for text and appreciate it. 
Especially in the world of a writer, text is a very loyal friend. It is an excellent form of mass communication. 
An excellent use of text recently is the way that online we are able to have conversations or discussion about a certain topic with people from all over the world. While in the conversation we are able to easily locate extra information and simply link people to back up arguments, etc. These technology are seriously pushing us forward through the new age of technology, and hopefully journalists will be able to keep up. 
Having online blogs is one way journalists utilise both text and the online platform. 

Another new form of news text and media is news games! In class we were shown one called 'Cutthroat Capitalism'. It was quite an interesting experience. The game featured around the events of real pirates of the coasts boarding ships and holding crew hostage until they were paid a specific amount. The game allows you to experience this from the pirates' perspective. 

I went and further researched other news games that are currently available online and found the following:

And there are heaps more out there if you just google it. It's really quite an amazing way to get an inside view on the news. 

Tuesday, 13 March 2012

Evolution of web

The topic of the lecture this week was 'New News'. It focused strongly on the different webs and how it is affecting news today.

Web 1.0
Web 1.0 is defined as the information web and focused specifically on companies. It was like a big brochure full of advertising. It was the start of the interwebs generation and was naturally very basic. Personally, I found it highly irritating to use - too many ads (irony?).

Now we have moved into a newer generation of the web. The younger, more-loved sibling of dear, old Web 1.0.

Web 2.0
Web 2.0 is the social web that we all know and love today. Obviously it is strongly focused on social groups and mass communication. Today, I find it highly unlikely that any person living in an established country does not use some form of social media from time to time. Even those old grans and pops are logging in to these 'good-for-nothing-computing-machines' to use programs such as Skype to talk to family all over the world. Web 2.0 is also very much focused on 'prod-users' (producer users). It is allowing everyone to be linked to each other, and it creates a network where you can get anything you want out there (good or bad.)

Web 3.0
And now, still newly emerging, we have web 3.0. This brand new web is focusing on the individual specifically and is also known as the "semantic web". It uses metatagging, hyperlocalisation and specific content delivery to help find information that is specifically relevant to the individual alone. However, this has many possible downfalls. Primarily: ignorance! 
Given the opportunity to only choose news which the individual find interesting, there's a very likely chance that ignorance of other important issues, however uninteresting, will grow exponentially. World coverage of news may be quickly forgotten, and only some news will be known to some people who choose to know it. 
Now isn't that a scary possibility? 



Oh, you, journalism.

In this first lecture, the current challenges of journalism were discussed (amongst other standard, introductory topics). Briefly, these challenges were things such as technology, the general dislike of journos today, citizen journos and news being perceived as entertainment.

The main point raised was, 'Is technology the death of print media?'
And in this aspiring journalists eyes, 'It most certainly is not!'
Perhaps, we'll see a decrease in newspapers, but online print media is going to boom and it's something we all should be prepared for.
Sorry, Superman!